|
God knows, there are an awful lot
of things about deer hunting that I truly love but dealing with my
buck covered with ticks definitely isn’t one of them. I shot a
pretty good deer this past fall; my biggest ever in Vermont, 163
pounds. The trouble is that by the time that old ridge-runner had
hung for a day on the camp pole; it became evident that he was more
than just a little bit “ticky”.
There really isn’t anything
strange about ticks on deer but in my career as a homegrown deer
hunter, there are definitely more now than there used to be. In
fact, by the time I peeled the hide down off that buck, I had
already taken over 3 dozen mature deer ticks off of him, most
squished between my needle nose pliers.
I think it was back in the early
‘80’s, about the time we started getting hooked on bow hunting, that
I first noticed ticks on deer. The consensus among my hunting
buddies was that it probably had to do with shooting deer earlier in
the year. After-all, prior to bow seasons, nearly all deer were shot
during the much colder weather of the November rut. But, all those
ticks on my rifle killed deer last November got me thinking there
must be more to this story.
I started with a call to Keith
Gallant, the warden here in central Vermont and followed up with a
conversation with local taxidermist, Rodney Elmer. Both agreed that
there were definitely a lot more ticks in the deer herd today than
ever before. Many hunters may not even have a frame of reference for
this discussion because unless you are around a lot of dead deer and
handle their hides you just might not have had the contact to
develop a perspective on any change in tick populations. But for a
game warden, a taxidermist or a hunter who skins and processes his
own deer there is little doubt.
By the time I talked to Don Tobi,
forestry entomologist at the University of Vermont, it was already
clear that we were witnessing somewhat of a population explosion.
“Last summer while doing field
work I was amazed at the number of ticks I was picking up on my pant
legs after only a few hours outside.” He went on to verify that
there is also a very high incidence, within the tick population, of
the bacteria that causes Lyme disease.
It’s interesting to note that
deer ticks are pretty common around the country particularly in
places with high deer densities like the South and Midwest. The new
development is their recent widespread existence in northern New
England.
So what do we need to know about
ticks and the diseases they carry? I set out to find some answers.
Don Tobi referred me to Jon
Turmel, who for the last 33 years has held the post of Vermont’s
State Entomologist. In Don’s words, “Jon knows more about ticks and
every other kind of bug than anybody you’ll ever meet.” And he was
right.
You’ve probably heard that the
big deer ticks are not the ones that carry Lyme disease, it’s the
smaller wood ticks to watch out for. WRONG.
According to Mr. Turmel and
seconded by several other sources, all ticks can carry Lyme disease
bacteria as well as a host of other stuff you don’t want to catch.
“Deer ticks are the most likely
to carry the bacteria which they pick-up from white-footed mice and
chipmunks but trying to distinguish their species by size is
impossible.”
A deer tick’s 2 year life cycle
has four phases; egg, larval, nymph and adult and in each of these
phases except the egg stage, the parasite is capable of giving you
Lyme disease. When the adult female’s egg sack is at full term, she
will drop off the host and lay her eggs on the ground. The
six-legged larvae will often attach to a mouse. Although unaffected
by it, mice typically are the source of the Lyme disease bacteria.
The nymph stage resembles the adult with 8 legs but is tiny in
comparison. It climbs up blades of grass or weeds attaching itself
to deer, people or other animals as they walk by. It is at this
stage that the confusion about size and species has developed.
The simplest way to keep it straight is to recognize that
deer ticks, wood ticks, seed ticks, dog ticks, etc. are all ticks
and that having them burrowing their nasty little heads into your
skin is never a good thing.
An early symptom of Lyme disease
is the development of a rash which initially appears around the site
of the tick bite but in some instances does not show up for weeks or
months. The fact that
half of infected individuals never get the rash was of little
consequence to me. By the time I got done talking to the bug experts
I was starting to itch all over.
Doctor
Patsy Kelso of the Vermont Health Department did little to help my
pre-paranoia, hypochondriactic mind-set when she told me that the
increase of reported cases of Lyme disease paralleled what the
entomologists were reporting regarding tick populations. In Vermont
there were only 29 confirmed cases of Lyme disease in 2005. By 2007
the number was 138 and by 2008, 330 cases had been reported. For
years the disease often went miss diagnosed because aside from a
rash, the early symptoms were similar to the flu; fever, fatigue,
headache, etc. In its later stages Lyme disease was associated with
everything from heart disease to dementia. I scratched the back of
my neck and wondered if the health care industry was even on top of
this would-be epidemic and where was the media coverage?
With all this talk about ticks,
my seasonal dry skin itch, an inconvenience I deal with every
winter, was now a bigger than life personal health emergency. I
called my doctor.
I’ve known Dr. Ken Borie for
years and I trust him. He has the perfect personality for a doctor
punctuated by the fact that he actually cares a great deal about the
mental and physical
health
of his patients.
“Glenn, listen to me, you don’t
have Lyme disease…”
As usual, his soft calming voice
dispelled my fear. He
assured me that Lyme disease was on every doctor’s radar but most
health care professionals no longer viewed it as a disease with
serious long term effects.
“In order to contract the disease
the tick usually has to be embedded in your skin for 24-36 hours and
if you get Lyme disease it is affectively treated with antibiotics.”
He went on to reveal that the whole issue of late term symptoms –
called chronic Lyme disease had pretty much been dispelled by modern
medical science. As recently as 2007, a review by the New England
Journal of Medicine suggested that there was no convincing
scientific evidence of long term effects of the disease.
This does not mean there are not
other theories but, Dr. Borie confidently spoke of the current
thinking on treatment.
“Most doctors today take a pretty
aggressive approach to treating tick bites. If someone has
definitely been bitten a single 200mg dose of antibiotic is usually
all that is needed. For patients that do not know they have been
bitten or wait until Lyme symptoms appear, then a therapy of
antibiotics over a 3-4 week period may be required. In either case,
treatment is effective in curing the problem.”
So there you have it: are there
more ticks around? Definitely, although the jury is still out on
why. It was mentioned that it could be related to climate change but
it could as easily be some other yet to be understood natural cycle.
Do you get Lyme disease from infected ticks? You bet, and
conservative estimates put 20% or more of deer ticks as carriers.
Should you worry about the consequences? Up to you, but like
everything else you should be respectful of your natural
environment; check yourself for ticks after being in the woods. You
are more likely to pick them up in the summer than fall unless you
handle dead deer. When hanging your deer, be aware that as the
carcass cools the ticks will become more evident as they climb from
the skin to the outside of the hair. Several people I spoke with
suggested putting a kiddy pool half full of soapy water underneath
to catch and suffocate the ticks as they drop off. If you know for
sure you have been bitten, call your doctor and get your shot. For
me I’m going to stick with the pliers and the satisfaction of
pinching the nasty little anthropoids til they pop. And as for
intimidating my deer hunting; come-on, you know I’ve got an itch for
it.
|