Feeding deer was never a widespread practice anywhere in the north
country that I know of. For starters its expensive and once begun,
must be maintained. Prior to Vermont Fish & Wildlife's ban on
the practice a few years ago there were some in the sporting and conservation
ranks that thought the state should actually play a role in supporting
if not subsidizing those groups and individuals that took the time,
effort and money to help each year's fawn crop get through the toughest
months of winter. The ban on feeding, justified by the state to reduce
the possible spread of diseases like Chronic Wasting Disease, did
leave room for those who want to make a contribution to the health
of local wildlife by developing food plots, cutting browse and in
the case of farmers; leaving standing corn and other crops for winter
forage.
The intent of this column is not to cast stones at Vermont's deer
management plan which I personally believe is mostly headed in the
right direction. No, I simply have a question that's been bugging
me since spending a few weeks in the Northern Rockies a couple of
summers ago. You see out there, wildlife populations could not be
sustained without a serious supplemental feeding program for deer
and elk. But wait a minute. Wasn't CWD first discovered in mule
deer in Colorado in the mid 1960's and in elk in Wyoming in the
late 70's? Of course it was, and over the last 40 years it has been
documented in 14 other states and 2-3 Canadian provinces. Here's
the hitch; Vermont has outlawed feeding deer and specifically sites
the danger of CWD transmission as the primary reason for the ban.
Western states collectively spend millions of dollars on hay every
winter to feed huge numbers of deer and elk. The federal government
feeds 5,000 or more animals each winter on the National Elk Refuge
in Jackson Hole alone.
Speaking of Jackson Hole, I took my inquest to the internet search
engines and found a series of articles on the feeding grounds from
the Jackson Hole News & Guide. This liberal bastion of out-of-state
rhetoric in the heart of cowboy country is an interesting dichotomy
in its own right. The postings concerning elk & deer feeding
typically support a total ban on feeding for mostly political reasons
but I did come across a disturbing concept being promoted by anti-hunting
groups. Get this: their solution is to close the feeding grounds,
acknowledging the probable starvation of 80% of the deer and elk
herds but when viewed in conjunction with the continued protection
of growing wolf and grizzly populations; somehow, miraculously,
the natural order of things will be restored in flawless beauty
and collective harmony. Nobody will ever have an excuse to hunt
again.
But, nobody's talking about CWD!
I spoke with Terry Pollard, his family has outfitted in the Bridger
Wilderness and Wind River Mountains of Western Wyoming for 5 generations
and he is active in the maintenance of several of the large feed
grounds in the Pinedale area. I asked him straight out why nobody
is worried about the spread of CWD?
"The state feed ground program has been in place since 1912
with our current 22 sites on the map since the 60's. The discussion
about the spread of disease with the wintering elk is as hot a topic
today as it's ever been but has little to do with Chronic Wasting
Disease."
It seems that the general consensus concerning CWD is that it has
probably always been around or at least since the early 19th century.
You haven't read a lot about it lately because there isn't any new,
news. Every year some animals test positive for it but the numbers
are reasonably stable and certainly not what you would expect from
states that feed thousands of animals in close proximity. You would
think that if Chronic Wasting Disease was spreading among these
wintering herds you might have heard something about it. After all,
the practice has been in place for nearly a century.
According to Terry, the problem is a disease called Brucellosis
which affects the reproductive system and can be passed from elk
to cattle and visa versa.
"The feed grounds are actually a way for us to keep our wild
herds separated from free ranging cattle and provide the primary
means for curbing the spread of Brucellosis."
Dumbstruck, I asked the question again, "So Terry, it's really
not about CWD?"
His answer didn't change and so my quandary remains.
|